[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221122073244.21279-1-hu1.chen@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 23:32:43 -0800
From: Chen Hu <hu1.chen@...el.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: hu1.chen@...el.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] selftests/bpf: Fix "missing ENDBR" BUG for destructor kfunc
With CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT enabled, the test_verifier triggers the
following BUG:
traps: Missing ENDBR: bpf_kfunc_call_test_release+0x0/0x30
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:254!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
<TASK>
asm_exc_control_protection+0x26/0x50
RIP: 0010:bpf_kfunc_call_test_release+0x0/0x30
Code: 00 48 c7 c7 18 f2 e1 b4 e8 0d ca 8c ff 48 c7 c0 00 f2 e1 b4 c3
0f 1f 44 00 00 66 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 0b 31 c0 c3 66 90
<66> 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 85 ff 74 13 4c 8d 47 18 b8 ff ff ff
bpf_map_free_kptrs+0x2e/0x70
array_map_free+0x57/0x140
process_one_work+0x194/0x3a0
worker_thread+0x54/0x3a0
? rescuer_thread+0x390/0x390
kthread+0xe9/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
This is because there are no compile-time references to the destructor
kfuncs, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() for example. So objtool marked
them sealable and ENDBR in the functions were sealed (converted to NOP)
by apply_ibt_endbr().
This fix creates dummy compile-time references to destructor kfuncs so
ENDBR stay there.
Fixes: 05a945deefaa ("selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for kptr")
Signed-off-by: Chen Hu <hu1.chen@...el.com>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
---
v2:
- Use generic macro name and place the macro after function body as
- suggested by Jiri Olsa
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121085113.611504-1-hu1.chen@intel.com/
include/linux/btf_ids.h | 7 +++++++
net/bpf/test_run.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
index 2aea877d644f..db02691b506d 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
@@ -266,4 +266,11 @@ MAX_BTF_TRACING_TYPE,
extern u32 btf_tracing_ids[];
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT) && !defined(__DISABLE_EXPORTS)
+#define FUNC_IBT_NOSEAL(name) \
+ asm(IBT_NOSEAL(#name));
+#else
+#define FUNC_IBT_NOSEAL(name)
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT */
+
#endif
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 13d578ce2a09..07263b7cc12d 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -597,10 +597,14 @@ noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p)
refcount_dec(&p->cnt);
}
+FUNC_IBT_NOSEAL(bpf_kfunc_call_test_release)
+
noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release(struct prog_test_member *p)
{
}
+FUNC_IBT_NOSEAL(bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release)
+
noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_memb1_release(struct prog_test_member1 *p)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists