netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert "veth: Avoid drop packets when xdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:57:41 +0800
From:   Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, toke@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert "veth: Avoid drop packets when xdp_redirect
 performs" and its fix



在 2022/11/22 下午12:35, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:50:13 +0800 Heng Qi wrote:
>> This patch 2e0de6366ac16 enables napi of the peer veth automatically when the
>> veth loads the xdp, but it breaks down as reported by Paolo and John. So reverting
>> it and its fix, we will rework the patch and make it more robust based on comments.
> Did anything change since the previous posting?

Do you mean this positing?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121112848.51388-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com/

If yes, there is no difference between this posting and the posting 
posted by the link. This posting is to make it easier to merge.