netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: Complete conversion to i2c_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:40:11 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, uwe@...ine-koenig.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: Complete conversion to
 i2c_probe_new

On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:38:43 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Reposting for Uwe the networking slice of his mega-series:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org/
> > so that our build bot can confirm the obvious.
> > 
> > fix mlx5 -> mlxsw while at it.  
> 
> What is the relevant difference that made the build bot consider your
> resent but not my series? Is it "net-next" in the Subject?

Not all patches hit the netdev ML so the bot considered the series
incomplete, at least on our end. I'm guessing the general Intel bot
can reconstruct a partial series based on LKML.