netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: devlink: fix UAF in devlink_compat_running

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y30dPRzO045Od2FA@unreal>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:04:29 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: devlink: fix UAF in
 devlink_compat_running_version()

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:25:31PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2022/11/22 22:32, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:10:48PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > I got a UAF report as following when doing fault injection test:
> > > 
> > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in devlink_compat_running_version+0x5b9/0x6a0
> > > Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810ac591f0 by task systemd-udevd/458
> > > 
> > > CPU: 2 PID: 458 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-00155-ga9d2b54dd4e7-dirty #1359
> > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> > > Call Trace:
> > >   <TASK>
> > >   kasan_report+0x90/0x190
> > >   devlink_compat_running_version+0x5b9/0x6a0
> > >   dev_ethtool+0x2ca/0x340
> > >   dev_ioctl+0x16c/0xff0
> > >   sock_do_ioctl+0x1ae/0x220
> > > 
> > > Allocated by task 456:
> > >   kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> > >   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
> > >   __kasan_kmalloc+0x7e/0x90
> > >   __kmalloc+0x59/0x1b0
> > >   devlink_alloc_ns+0xf7/0xa10
> > >   nsim_drv_probe+0xa8/0x150 [netdevsim]
> > >   really_probe+0x1ff/0x660
> > > 
> > > Freed by task 456:
> > >   kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
> > >   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
> > >   kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
> > >   __kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
> > >   __kmem_cache_free+0xca/0x400
> > >   nsim_drv_probe.cold.31+0x2af/0xf62 [netdevsim]
> > >   really_probe+0x1ff/0x660
> > > 
> > > It happened like this:
> > > 
> > > processor A							processor B
> > > nsim_drv_probe()
> > >    devlink_alloc_ns()
> > >    nsim_dev_port_add_all()
> > >      __nsim_dev_port_add() // add eth1 successful
> > > 								dev_ethtool()
> > > 								  ethtool_get_drvinfo(eth1)
> > > 								    netdev_to_devlink_get(eth1)
> > > 								      devlink_try_get() // get devlink here
> > >      __nsim_dev_port_add() // add eth2 failed, goto error
> > >        devlink_free() // it's called in the error path
> > > 								  devlink_compat_running_version() <- causes UAF
> > >    devlink_register() // it's in normal path, not called yet
> > > 
> > > There is two ports to add in nsim_dev_port_add_all(), if first
> > > port is added successful, the devlink is visable and can be get
> > > by devlink_try_get() on another cpu, but it is not registered
> > > yet. And then the second port is failed to added, in the error
> > > path, devlink_free() is called, at last it causes UAF.
> > > 
> > > Add check in devlink_try_get(), if the 'devlink' is not registered
> > > it returns NULL to avoid UAF like this case.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: a62fdbbe9403 ("netdevsim: implement ndo_get_devlink_port")
> > > Reported-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   net/core/devlink.c | 3 +++
> > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> > > index 89baa7c0938b..6453ac0558fb 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> > > @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
> > >   struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
> > >   {
> > > +	 if (!xa_get_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_REGISTERED))
> > > +		return NULL;
> > > +
> > Please fix nsim instead of devlink.
> I think if devlink is not registered, it can not be get and used, but there
> is no API for driver to check this, can I introduce a new helper name
> devlink_is_registered() for driver using.

There is no need in such API as driver calls to devlink_register() and
as such it knows when devlink is registered.

This UAF is nsim specific issue. Real devices have single .probe()
routine with serialized registration flow. None of them will use
devlink_is_registered() call.

Thanks

> 
> Thanks,
> Yang
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > >   	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&devlink->refcount))
> > >   		return devlink;
> > >   	return NULL;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 
> > .