[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221122022559.89459-8-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:25:52 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
Chris Mi <cmi@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 07/14] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Set correctly vport destination
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
The cited commit moved from using reformat_id integer to packet_reformat
pointer which introduced the possibility to null pointer dereference.
When setting packet reformat flag and pkt_reformat pointer must
exists so checking MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP is not enough, we need
to make sure the pkt_reformat is valid and check for MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP_VALID.
If the dest encap valid flag does not exists then pkt_reformat can be
either invalid address or null.
Also, to make sure we don't try to access invalid pkt_reformat set it to
null when invalidated and invalidate it before calling add flow code as
its logically more correct and to be safe.
Fixes: 2b688ea5efde ("net/mlx5: Add flow steering actions to fs_cmd shim layer")
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Mi <cmi@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c | 10 ++++++----
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
index 5aff97914367..5b6a79d2034e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
@@ -224,15 +224,16 @@ void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_del(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
list_for_each_entry(flow, flow_list, tmp_list) {
if (!mlx5e_is_offloaded_flow(flow) || flow_flag_test(flow, SLOW))
continue;
- spec = &flow->attr->parse_attr->spec;
-
- /* update from encap rule to slow path rule */
- rule = mlx5e_tc_offload_to_slow_path(esw, flow, spec);
attr = mlx5e_tc_get_encap_attr(flow);
esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
/* mark the flow's encap dest as non-valid */
esw_attr->dests[flow->tmp_entry_index].flags &= ~MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP_VALID;
+ esw_attr->dests[flow->tmp_entry_index].pkt_reformat = NULL;
+
+ /* update from encap rule to slow path rule */
+ spec = &flow->attr->parse_attr->spec;
+ rule = mlx5e_tc_offload_to_slow_path(esw, flow, spec);
if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rule);
@@ -251,6 +252,7 @@ void mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_del(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
/* we know that the encap is valid */
e->flags &= ~MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID;
mlx5_packet_reformat_dealloc(priv->mdev, e->pkt_reformat);
+ e->pkt_reformat = NULL;
}
static void mlx5e_take_tmp_flow(struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 728ca9f2bb9d..3fda75fe168c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ esw_setup_vport_dest(struct mlx5_flow_destination *dest, struct mlx5_flow_act *f
mlx5_lag_mpesw_is_activated(esw->dev))
dest[dest_idx].type = MLX5_FLOW_DESTINATION_TYPE_UPLINK;
}
- if (esw_attr->dests[attr_idx].flags & MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP) {
+ if (esw_attr->dests[attr_idx].flags & MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP_VALID) {
if (pkt_reformat) {
flow_act->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_PACKET_REFORMAT;
flow_act->pkt_reformat = esw_attr->dests[attr_idx].pkt_reformat;
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists