[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHoRjeU_28Sm+SoYQ6NP4W0ppK+okUubWt2orwgAZ2B4RVwfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:01:54 -0800
From: Steve Williams <steve.williams@...cruise.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, xiaoliang.yang_1@....com
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next] net/hanic: Add the hanic network
interface for high availability links
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:55 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > ../drivers/net/hanic/hanic_sysfs.c:83:31: error: ‘struct hanic_netns’ has no member named ‘class_attr_sandlan_interfaces’; did you mean ‘class_attr_hanic_interfaces’?
> > 83 | sysfs_attr_init(&xns->class_attr_sandlan_interfaces.attr);
>
> There was another submission over the weekend adding a network
> emulation system called sandlan. The cover latter for this patchset
> should of at minimum said there was a dependency between the two. But
> in practice, there should not be any dependency at all. It is unclear
> if sandlan will get merged.
>
Hanic does not rely on sandlan. I used sandlan as a test bed while implementing
the hanic driver, and apparently some bits leaked into this patch. I'll fix it.
--
Stephen Williams
Senior Software Engineer
Cruise
--
*Confidentiality Note:* We care about protecting our proprietary
information, confidential material, and trade secrets. This message may
contain some or all of those things. Cruise will suffer material harm if
anyone other than the intended recipient disseminates or takes any action
based on this message. If you have received this message (including any
attachments) in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender
promptly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists