netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] bonding: fix link recovery in mode 2 when updelay is nonzero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <f5a7893d8a83c6fb8233bb3127d301e12f45e9b3.1669147951.git.jtoppins@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:24:29 -0500
From:   Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
To:     "netdev @ vger . kernel . org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] bonding: fix link recovery in mode 2 when updelay is nonzero

Before this change when a bond in mode 2 lost link, all of its slaves
lost link, the bonding device would never recover even after the
expiration of updelay. This change removes the updelay when the bond
currently has no usable links. Conforming to bonding.txt section 13.1
paragraph 4.

Fixes: 41f891004063 ("bonding: ignore updelay param when there is no active slave")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
---

Notes:
    v2:
     * added fixes tag and reposted to net tree

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index f298b9b3eb77..f747bd60d399 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2536,7 +2536,16 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
 	struct slave *slave;
 	bool ignore_updelay;
 
-	ignore_updelay = !rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+	if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
+		ignore_updelay = !rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+	} else {
+		struct bond_up_slave *usable_slaves;
+
+		usable_slaves = rcu_dereference(bond->usable_slaves);
+
+		if (usable_slaves && usable_slaves->count == 0)
+			ignore_updelay = true;
+	}
 
 	bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
 		bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_NOCHANGE);
-- 
2.31.1