| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221122022559.89459-11-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:25:55 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Chris Mi <cmi@...dia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 10/14] net/mlx5e: Offload rule only when all encaps are valid
From: Chris Mi <cmi@...dia.com>
The cited commit adds a for loop to support multiple encapsulations.
But it only checks if the last encap is valid.
Fix it by setting slow path flag when one of the encap is invalid.
Fixes: f493f15534ec ("net/mlx5e: Move flow attr reformat action bit to per dest flags")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mi <cmi@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c | 6 ++----
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.h | 3 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 17 ++++++-----------
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
index 5b6a79d2034e..ff73d25bc6eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.c
@@ -764,8 +764,7 @@ int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct net_device *mirred_dev,
int out_index,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct net_device **encap_dev,
- bool *encap_valid)
+ struct net_device **encap_dev)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
struct mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr *parse_attr;
@@ -880,9 +879,8 @@ int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
if (e->flags & MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID) {
attr->esw_attr->dests[out_index].pkt_reformat = e->pkt_reformat;
attr->esw_attr->dests[out_index].flags |= MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP_VALID;
- *encap_valid = true;
} else {
- *encap_valid = false;
+ flow_flag_set(flow, SLOW);
}
mutex_unlock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.h
index d542b8476491..8ad273dde40e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun_encap.h
@@ -17,8 +17,7 @@ int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct net_device *mirred_dev,
int out_index,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct net_device **encap_dev,
- bool *encap_valid);
+ struct net_device **encap_dev);
int mlx5e_attach_decap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 5a6aa61ec82a..bd9936af4582 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -1634,7 +1634,6 @@ set_encap_dests(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow,
struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool *encap_valid,
bool *vf_tun)
{
struct mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr *parse_attr;
@@ -1651,7 +1650,6 @@ set_encap_dests(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
parse_attr = attr->parse_attr;
esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
*vf_tun = false;
- *encap_valid = true;
for (out_index = 0; out_index < MLX5_MAX_FLOW_FWD_VPORTS; out_index++) {
struct net_device *out_dev;
@@ -1668,7 +1666,7 @@ set_encap_dests(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
goto out;
}
err = mlx5e_attach_encap(priv, flow, attr, out_dev, out_index,
- extack, &encap_dev, encap_valid);
+ extack, &encap_dev);
dev_put(out_dev);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -1732,8 +1730,8 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5e_tc_flow_parse_attr *parse_attr;
struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr = flow->attr;
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr;
- bool vf_tun, encap_valid;
u32 max_prio, max_chain;
+ bool vf_tun;
int err = 0;
parse_attr = attr->parse_attr;
@@ -1823,7 +1821,7 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
esw_attr->int_port = int_port;
}
- err = set_encap_dests(priv, flow, attr, extack, &encap_valid, &vf_tun);
+ err = set_encap_dests(priv, flow, attr, extack, &vf_tun);
if (err)
goto err_out;
@@ -1853,7 +1851,7 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
* (1) there's no error
* (2) there's an encap action and we don't have valid neigh
*/
- if (!encap_valid || flow_flag_test(flow, SLOW))
+ if (flow_flag_test(flow, SLOW))
flow->rule[0] = mlx5e_tc_offload_to_slow_path(esw, flow, &parse_attr->spec);
else
flow->rule[0] = mlx5e_tc_offload_fdb_rules(esw, flow, &parse_attr->spec, attr);
@@ -3759,7 +3757,7 @@ alloc_flow_post_acts(struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
struct mlx5e_post_act *post_act = get_post_action(flow->priv);
struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr, *next_attr = NULL;
struct mlx5e_post_act_handle *handle;
- bool vf_tun, encap_valid = true;
+ bool vf_tun;
int err;
/* This is going in reverse order as needed.
@@ -3781,13 +3779,10 @@ alloc_flow_post_acts(struct mlx5e_tc_flow *flow, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
if (list_is_last(&attr->list, &flow->attrs))
break;
- err = set_encap_dests(flow->priv, flow, attr, extack, &encap_valid, &vf_tun);
+ err = set_encap_dests(flow->priv, flow, attr, extack, &vf_tun);
if (err)
goto out_free;
- if (!encap_valid)
- flow_flag_set(flow, SLOW);
-
err = actions_prepare_mod_hdr_actions(flow->priv, flow, attr, extack);
if (err)
goto out_free;
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists