[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221123084639.430560487@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:52:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.0 306/314] netlink: Bounds-check struct nlmsgerr creation
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
commit 710d21fdff9a98d621cd4e64167f3ef8af4e2fd1 upstream.
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE doing bounds-check on memcpy(),
switch from __nlmsg_put to nlmsg_put(), and explain the bounds check
for dealing with the memcpy() across a composite flexible array struct.
Avoids this future run-time warning:
memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 32) of single field "&errmsg->msg" at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2447 (size 16)
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: coreteam@...filter.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901071336.1418572-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c | 8 +++++---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
@@ -1719,11 +1719,13 @@ call_ad(struct net *net, struct sock *ct
skb2 = nlmsg_new(payload, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb2)
return -ENOMEM;
- rep = __nlmsg_put(skb2, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid,
- nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLMSG_ERROR, payload, 0);
+ rep = nlmsg_put(skb2, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid,
+ nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLMSG_ERROR, payload, 0);
errmsg = nlmsg_data(rep);
errmsg->error = ret;
- memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, nlh->nlmsg_len);
+ unsafe_memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, nlh->nlmsg_len,
+ /* Bounds checked by the skb layer. */);
+
cmdattr = (void *)&errmsg->msg + min_len;
ret = nla_parse(cda, IPSET_ATTR_CMD_MAX, cmdattr,
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -2440,11 +2440,13 @@ void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
return;
}
- rep = __nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
- NLMSG_ERROR, payload, flags);
+ rep = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
+ NLMSG_ERROR, payload, flags);
errmsg = nlmsg_data(rep);
errmsg->error = err;
- memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, payload > sizeof(*errmsg) ? nlh->nlmsg_len : sizeof(*nlh));
+ unsafe_memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, payload > sizeof(*errmsg)
+ ? nlh->nlmsg_len : sizeof(*nlh),
+ /* Bounds checked by the skb layer. */);
if (nlk_has_extack && extack) {
if (extack->_msg) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists