[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <166919851334.1258552.5693472286628426234.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:15:13 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/17] rxrpc: Don't use sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to
guard socket state changes
Don't use sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to guard socket state changes as the
socket mutex is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
---
net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 7a0dc01741e7..8ad4d85acb0b 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -812,14 +812,12 @@ static int rxrpc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int flags)
lock_sock(sk);
- spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (sk->sk_state < RXRPC_CLOSE) {
sk->sk_state = RXRPC_CLOSE;
sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
} else {
ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
rxrpc_discard_prealloc(rx);
@@ -872,9 +870,7 @@ static int rxrpc_release_sock(struct sock *sk)
break;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
sk->sk_state = RXRPC_CLOSE;
- spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (rx->local && rcu_access_pointer(rx->local->service) == rx) {
write_lock(&rx->local->services_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists