lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:26:41 -0800
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] mlx4: Introduce mlx4_xdp_buff
 wrapper for xdp_buff

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:33 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > No functional changes. Boilerplate to allow stuffing more data after xdp_buff.
> >
> > Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
> > Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
> > Cc: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>
> > Cc: xdp-hints@...-project.net
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 26 +++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> > index 8f762fc170b3..467356633172 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> > @@ -661,17 +661,21 @@ static int check_csum(struct mlx4_cqe *cqe, struct sk_buff *skb, void *va,
> >  #define MLX4_CQE_STATUS_IP_ANY (MLX4_CQE_STATUS_IPV4)
> >  #endif
> >
> > +struct mlx4_xdp_buff {
> > +     struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > +};
>
> This embedding trick works for drivers that put xdp_buff on the stack,
> but mlx5 supports XSK zerocopy, which uses the xsk_buff_pool for
> allocating them. This makes it a bit awkward to do the same thing there;
> and since it's probably going to be fairly common to do something like
> this, how about we just add a 'void *drv_priv' pointer to struct
> xdp_buff that the drivers can use? The xdp_buff already takes up a full
> cache line anyway, so any data stuffed after it will spill over to a new
> one; so I don't think there's much difference performance-wise.

I guess the alternative is to extend xsk_buff_pool with some new
argument for xdp_buff tailroom? (so it can kmalloc(sizeof(xdp_buff) +
xdp_buff_tailroom))
But it seems messy because there is no way of knowing what the target
device's tailroom is, so it has to be a user setting :-/
I've started with a priv pointer in xdp_buff initially, it seems fine
to go back. I'll probably convert veth/mlx4 to the same mode as well
to avoid having different approaches in different places..

> I'll send my patch to add support to mlx5 (using the drv_priv pointer
> approach) separately.

Saw them, thanks! Will include them in v3+.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ