[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221123203834.738606-6-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:38:30 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] devlink: refactor region_read_snapshot_fill to use a callback function
The devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill is used to copy the contents of
a snapshot into a message for reporting to userspace via the
DEVLINK_CMG_REGION_READ netlink message.
A future change is going to add support for directly reading from
a region. Almost all of the logic for this new capability is identical.
To help reduce code duplication and make this logic more generic,
refactor the function to take a cb and cb_priv pointer for doing the
actual copy.
Add a devlink_region_snapshot_fill implementation that will simply copy
the relevant chunk of the region. This does require allocating some
storage for the chunk as opposed to simply passing the correct address
forward to the devlink_nl_cmg_region_read_chunk_fill function.
A future change to implement support for directly reading from a region
without a snapshot will provide a separate implementation that calls the
newly added devlink region operation.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Use kmalloc instead of kzalloc
* Don't combine data_size declaration and assignment
* Fix the always_unused placement for devlink_region_snapshot_fill
net/core/devlink.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index bd7af0600405..729e2162a4db 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -6460,25 +6460,36 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_chunk_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
#define DEVLINK_REGION_READ_CHUNK_SIZE 256
-static int devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot,
- u64 start_offset,
- u64 end_offset,
- u64 *new_offset)
+typedef int devlink_chunk_fill_t(void *cb_priv, u8 *chunk, u32 chunk_size,
+ u64 curr_offset,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+
+static int
+devlink_nl_region_read_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, devlink_chunk_fill_t *cb,
+ void *cb_priv, u64 start_offset, u64 end_offset,
+ u64 *new_offset, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
u64 curr_offset = start_offset;
int err = 0;
+ u8 *data;
+
+ /* Allocate and re-use a single buffer */
+ data = kmalloc(DEVLINK_REGION_READ_CHUNK_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
*new_offset = start_offset;
while (curr_offset < end_offset) {
u32 data_size;
- u8 *data;
data_size = min_t(u32, end_offset - curr_offset,
DEVLINK_REGION_READ_CHUNK_SIZE);
- data = &snapshot->data[curr_offset];
+ err = cb(cb_priv, data, data_size, curr_offset, extack);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+
err = devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_chunk_fill(skb, data, data_size, curr_offset);
if (err)
break;
@@ -6487,9 +6498,23 @@ static int devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
*new_offset = curr_offset;
+ kfree(data);
+
return err;
}
+static int
+devlink_region_snapshot_fill(void *cb_priv, u8 *chunk, u32 chunk_size,
+ u64 curr_offset,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack __always_unused *extack)
+{
+ struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot = cb_priv;
+
+ memcpy(chunk, &snapshot->data[curr_offset], chunk_size);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
@@ -6608,8 +6633,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
goto nla_put_failure;
}
- err = devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(skb, snapshot, start_offset,
- end_offset, &ret_offset);
+ err = devlink_nl_region_read_fill(skb, &devlink_region_snapshot_fill,
+ snapshot, start_offset, end_offset,
+ &ret_offset, cb->extack);
if (err && err != -EMSGSIZE)
goto nla_put_failure;
--
2.38.1.420.g319605f8f00e
Powered by blists - more mailing lists