lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANyCTtSgky6DNPasaLKs1sHpn_YDEoZgKb+WGbgKPd=UkFTeJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:01:02 +0100
From:   Nicolas Frayer <nfrayer@...libre.com>
To:     Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
Cc:     nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...libre.com, glaroque@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] soc: ti: Add module build support

Le jeu. 24 nov. 2022 à 08:53, Péter Ujfalusi
<peter.ujfalusi@...il.com> a écrit :

Hi Peter,
>
>
>
> On 08/11/2022 20:11, Nicolas Frayer wrote:
> > Added module build support for the TI K3 SoC info driver.
>
> Subject: "soc: ti: k3-socinfo: ..."
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frayer <nfrayer@...libre.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms |  1 -
> >   drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig       |  3 ++-
> >   drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c  | 11 +++++++++++
> >   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> > index 76580b932e44..4f2f92eb499f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> > @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ config ARCH_K3
> >       select TI_SCI_PROTOCOL
> >       select TI_SCI_INTR_IRQCHIP
> >       select TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP
> > -     select TI_K3_SOCINFO
> >       help
> >         This enables support for Texas Instruments' K3 multicore SoC
> >         architecture.
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> > index 7e2fb1c16af1..1a730c057cce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> > @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ config TI_K3_RINGACC
> >         If unsure, say N.
> >
> >   config TI_K3_SOCINFO
> > -     bool
> > +     tristate "TI K3 SoC info driver"
> > +     default y
>
> Why it is a good thing to have this driver as module compared to always
> built in?
> It has no dependencies, just things depending on it.
> It is small, just couple of lines long
>
> I don't really see the benefit of building it as a module, not even an
> academic one...
>

Just to give an update, this series will be dropped as it introduces
dependency issues
with consumer drivers.
The reason why I've enabled the module build support is because it is
required to build
vendor drivers as modules for Android GKI feature.

>
> >       depends on ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
> >       select SOC_BUS
> >       select MFD_SYSCON
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
> > index 19f3e74f5376..98348f998e0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/slab.h>
> >   #include <linux/string.h>
> >   #include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >
> >   #define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_REG             0
> >   /*
> > @@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id k3_chipinfo_of_match[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "ti,am654-chipid", },
> >       { /* sentinel */ },
> >   };
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_chipinfo_of_match);
> >
> >   static struct platform_driver k3_chipinfo_driver = {
> >       .driver = {
> > @@ -156,3 +158,12 @@ static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
> >       return platform_driver_register(&k3_chipinfo_driver);
> >   }
> >   subsys_initcall(k3_chipinfo_init);
>
> subsys_initcall for a module?

By including module.h, the subsys_initcall() is redefined as
module_init() when built
as a module. When built-in, it is redefined as the usual __initcall.

>
> > +
> > +static void __exit k3_chipinfo_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +     platform_driver_unregister(&k3_chipinfo_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(k3_chipinfo_exit);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 SoC info driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> --
> Péter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ