[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3+V9gu4NUQ7P0mL@shredder>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:04:06 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: RTM_DELROUTE not sent anymore when deleting (last) nexthop of
routes in 6.1
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:20:49PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> We have an integration test using FRR that got broken by this, so I
> can also easily test anything you throw at me (assuming CET working
> hours).
Please test the following fix [1]. Tested manually using [2]. With the
fix or 61b91eb33a69 reverted the route is successfully deleted. Without
the fix I get:
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
198.51.100.0/24 nhid 1 via 192.0.2.2 dev dummy10
If the fix is OK, I will submit it along with a selftest to make
sure it does not regress in the future.
Thanks
[1]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
index f721c308248b..19a662003eef 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
@@ -888,9 +888,11 @@ int fib_nh_match(struct net *net, struct fib_config *cfg, struct fib_info *fi,
return 1;
}
- /* cannot match on nexthop object attributes */
- if (fi->nh)
- return 1;
+ if (fi->nh) {
+ if (cfg->fc_oif || cfg->fc_gw_family || cfg->fc_mp)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
if (cfg->fc_oif || cfg->fc_gw_family) {
struct fib_nh *nh;
[2]
#!/bin/bash
ip link del dev dummy10 &> /dev/null
ip link add name dummy10 up type dummy
ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy10
ip nexthop add id 1 via 192.0.2.2 dev dummy10
ip route add 198.51.100.0/24 nhid 1
ip route del 198.51.100.0/24
ip route show 198.51.100.0/24
Powered by blists - more mailing lists