[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73b5ba7e-a4e2-ee95-d16b-942343a04d03@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:23:28 +0800
From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] iommu/dma: avoid expensive indirect calls for sync
operations
Hi,
On 2022/11/12 12:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Quite often, NIC devices do not need dma_sync operations
> on x86_64 at least.
>
> Indeed, when dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) is true and
> dev_use_swiotlb(dev) is false, iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu()
> and friends do nothing.
>
> However, indirectly calling them when CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y
> consumes about 10% of cycles on a cpu receiving packets
> from softirq at ~100Gbit rate, as shown in [1]
>
> Even if/when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is not set, there
> is a cost of about 3%.
>
> This patch adds a copy of iommu_dma_ops structure,
> where sync_single_for_cpu, sync_single_for_device,
> sync_sg_for_cpu and sync_sg_for_device are unset.
>
> perf profile before the patch:
>
> 18.53% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_skb
> 14.77% [kernel] [k] napi_reuse_skb
> 8.95% [kernel] [k] skb_release_data
> 5.42% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
> 5.37% [kernel] [k] memcpy
> <*> 5.26% [kernel] [k] iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu
> 4.78% [kernel] [k] tcp_gro_receive
> <*> 4.42% [kernel] [k] iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device
> 4.12% [kernel] [k] ipv6_gro_receive
> 3.65% [kernel] [k] gq_pool_get
> 3.25% [kernel] [k] skb_gro_receive
> 2.07% [kernel] [k] napi_gro_frags
> 1.98% [kernel] [k] tcp6_gro_receive
> 1.27% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_prep_buffers
> 1.18% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_napi_handler
> 0.99% [kernel] [k] csum_partial
> 0.74% [kernel] [k] csum_ipv6_magic
> 0.72% [kernel] [k] free_pcp_prepare
> 0.60% [kernel] [k] __napi_poll
> 0.58% [kernel] [k] net_rx_action
> 0.56% [kernel] [k] read_tsc
> <*> 0.50% [kernel] [k] __x86_indirect_thunk_r11
> 0.45% [kernel] [k] memset
>
> After patch, lines with <*> no longer show up, and overall
> cpu usage looks much better (~60% instead of ~72%)
>
> 25.56% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_skb
> 9.90% [kernel] [k] napi_reuse_skb
> 7.39% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
> 6.78% [kernel] [k] memcpy
> 6.53% [kernel] [k] skb_release_data
> 6.39% [kernel] [k] tcp_gro_receive
> 5.71% [kernel] [k] ipv6_gro_receive
> 4.35% [kernel] [k] napi_gro_frags
> 4.34% [kernel] [k] skb_gro_receive
> 3.50% [kernel] [k] gq_pool_get
> 3.08% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_napi_handler
> 2.35% [kernel] [k] tcp6_gro_receive
> 2.06% [kernel] [k] gq_rx_prep_buffers
> 1.32% [kernel] [k] csum_partial
> 0.93% [kernel] [k] csum_ipv6_magic
> 0.65% [kernel] [k] net_rx_action
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 9297b741f5e80e2408e864fc3f779410d6b04d49..976ba20a55eab5fd94e9bec2d38a2a60e0690444 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -522,6 +522,11 @@ static bool dev_use_swiotlb(struct device *dev)
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && dev_is_untrusted(dev);
> }
>
> +static bool dev_is_dma_sync_needed(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) || dev_use_swiotlb(dev);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * iommu_dma_init_domain - Initialise a DMA mapping domain
> * @domain: IOMMU domain previously prepared by iommu_get_dma_cookie()
> @@ -914,7 +919,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
> {
> phys_addr_t phys;
>
> - if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
> + if (!dev_is_dma_sync_needed(dev))
Seems this function is also called by iommu_dma_map_page() pair and it
already checked
if the device is coherent, so do we need this duplicate
dev_is_dma_sync_needed(dev) ?
How about we move this checking to iommu_dma_map_page()
/iommu_dma_unmap_page()
then no need checking here anymore ?
Thanks,
Ethan
> return;
>
> phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu_get_dma_domain(dev), dma_handle);
> @@ -930,7 +935,7 @@ static void iommu_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
> {
> phys_addr_t phys;
>
> - if (dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) && !dev_use_swiotlb(dev))
> + if (!dev_is_dma_sync_needed(dev))
> return;
>
> phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu_get_dma_domain(dev), dma_handle);
> @@ -1544,30 +1549,51 @@ static size_t iommu_dma_opt_mapping_size(void)
> return iova_rcache_range();
> }
>
> +#define iommu_dma_ops_common_fields \
> + .flags = DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED, \
> + .alloc = iommu_dma_alloc, \
> + .free = iommu_dma_free, \
> + .alloc_pages = dma_common_alloc_pages, \
> + .free_pages = dma_common_free_pages, \
> + .alloc_noncontiguous = iommu_dma_alloc_noncontiguous, \
> + .free_noncontiguous = iommu_dma_free_noncontiguous, \
> + .mmap = iommu_dma_mmap, \
> + .get_sgtable = iommu_dma_get_sgtable, \
> + .map_page = iommu_dma_map_page, \
> + .unmap_page = iommu_dma_unmap_page, \
> + .map_sg = iommu_dma_map_sg, \
> + .unmap_sg = iommu_dma_unmap_sg, \
> + .map_resource = iommu_dma_map_resource, \
> + .unmap_resource = iommu_dma_unmap_resource, \
> + .get_merge_boundary = iommu_dma_get_merge_boundary, \
> + .opt_mapping_size = iommu_dma_opt_mapping_size,
> +
> static const struct dma_map_ops iommu_dma_ops = {
> - .flags = DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED,
> - .alloc = iommu_dma_alloc,
> - .free = iommu_dma_free,
> - .alloc_pages = dma_common_alloc_pages,
> - .free_pages = dma_common_free_pages,
> - .alloc_noncontiguous = iommu_dma_alloc_noncontiguous,
> - .free_noncontiguous = iommu_dma_free_noncontiguous,
> - .mmap = iommu_dma_mmap,
> - .get_sgtable = iommu_dma_get_sgtable,
> - .map_page = iommu_dma_map_page,
> - .unmap_page = iommu_dma_unmap_page,
> - .map_sg = iommu_dma_map_sg,
> - .unmap_sg = iommu_dma_unmap_sg,
> + iommu_dma_ops_common_fields
> +
> .sync_single_for_cpu = iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu,
> .sync_single_for_device = iommu_dma_sync_single_for_device,
> .sync_sg_for_cpu = iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu,
> .sync_sg_for_device = iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device,
> - .map_resource = iommu_dma_map_resource,
> - .unmap_resource = iommu_dma_unmap_resource,
> - .get_merge_boundary = iommu_dma_get_merge_boundary,
> - .opt_mapping_size = iommu_dma_opt_mapping_size,
> };
>
> +/* Special instance of iommu_dma_ops for devices satisfying this condition:
> + * !dev_is_dma_sync_needed(dev)
> + *
> + * iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(), iommu_dma_sync_single_for_device(),
> + * iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(), iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device()
> + * do nothing special and can be avoided, saving indirect calls.
> + */
> +static const struct dma_map_ops iommu_nosync_dma_ops = {
> + iommu_dma_ops_common_fields
> +
> + .sync_single_for_cpu = NULL,
> + .sync_single_for_device = NULL,
> + .sync_sg_for_cpu = NULL,
> + .sync_sg_for_device = NULL,
> +};
> +#undef iommu_dma_ops_common_fields
> +
> /*
> * The IOMMU core code allocates the default DMA domain, which the underlying
> * IOMMU driver needs to support via the dma-iommu layer.
> @@ -1586,7 +1612,8 @@ void iommu_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 dma_limit)
> if (iommu_is_dma_domain(domain)) {
> if (iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, dma_limit, dev))
> goto out_err;
> - dev->dma_ops = &iommu_dma_ops;
> + dev->dma_ops = dev_is_dma_sync_needed(dev) ?
> + &iommu_dma_ops : &iommu_nosync_dma_ops;
> }
>
> return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists