Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:25:21 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alvin Šipraga 
        <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        "~postmarketos\/upstreaming\@lists.sr.ht" 
        <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
        "martin.botka\@somainline.org" <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno\@somainline.org" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        "marijn.suijten\@somainline.org" <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        "jamipkettunen\@somainline.org" <jamipkettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        "Zhao\, Jiaqing" <jiaqing.zhao@...el.com>,
        "Russell King \(Oracle\)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Soon Tak Lee <soontak.lee@...ress.com>,
        "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "brcm80211-dev-list.pdl\@broadcom.com" 
        <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        "SHA-cyfmac-dev-list\@infineon.com" 
        <SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Add support for BCM43596 PCIe Wi-Fi

Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> writes:

> On 25.11.2022 12:53, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> writes:
>> 
>>> On 21.11.2022 14:56, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 5:47 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can think of a couple of hacky ways to force use of 43596 fw, but I
>>>>> don't think any would be really upstreamable..
>>>>
>>>> If it is only known to affect the Sony Xperias mentioned then
>>>> a thing such as:
>>>>
>>>> if (of_machine_is_compatible("sony,xyz") ||
>>>>     of_machine_is_compatible("sony,zzz")... ) {
>>>>    // Enforce FW version
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> would be completely acceptable in my book. It hammers the
>>>> problem from the top instead of trying to figure out itsy witsy
>>>> details about firmware revisions.
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Linus Walleij
>>>
>>> Actually, I think I came up with a better approach by pulling a page
>>> out of Asahi folks' book - please take a look and tell me what you
>>> think about this:
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/4b6fccc995cd79109b0dae4e4ab2e48db97695e7
>>> [2]
>>> https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/e3ea1dc739634f734104f37fdbed046873921af7
>> 
>> Instead of a directory path ("brcm/brcmfmac43596-pcie") why not provide
>> just the chipset name ("brcmfmac43596-pcie")? IMHO it's unnecessary to
>> have directory names in Device Tree.
>
> I think it's common practice to include a full $FIRMWARE_DIR-relative
> path when specifying firmware in DT, though here I left out the board
> name bit as that's assigned dynamically anyway. That said, if you don't
> like it, I can change it.

It's just that I have understood that Device Tree is supposed to
describe hardware and to me a firmware directory "brcm/" is a software
property, not a hardware property. But this is really for the Device
Tree maintainers to decide, they know this best :)

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists