netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] can: etas_es58x: export product information through devlink_ops::info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4N9IAlQVsdyIJ9Q@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:07:12 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Lukas Magel <lukas.magel@...teo.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] can: etas_es58x: export product information
 through devlink_ops::info_get()

> I checked, none of gcc and clang would trigger a warning even for a
> 'make W=12'. More generally speaking, I made sure that my driver is
> free of any W=12.

That is good enough for me.

> I do not care any more as long as it does not result in
> undefined behaviour.

Agreed. Hopefully sscanf cannot go completely wrong and go off the end
of the buffer. That i would care about. Bit i guess the USB fuzzers
would of hit such problems already.

	Andrew