lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y4N9IAlQVsdyIJ9Q@lunn.ch> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:07:12 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Lukas Magel <lukas.magel@...teo.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] can: etas_es58x: export product information through devlink_ops::info_get() > I checked, none of gcc and clang would trigger a warning even for a > 'make W=12'. More generally speaking, I made sure that my driver is > free of any W=12. That is good enough for me. > I do not care any more as long as it does not result in > undefined behaviour. Agreed. Hopefully sscanf cannot go completely wrong and go off the end of the buffer. That i would care about. Bit i guess the USB fuzzers would of hit such problems already. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists