[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4RvS7Bns4Q8MorG@kili>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:20:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] bonding: uninitialized variable in
bond_miimon_inspect()
The "ignore_updelay" variable needs to be initialized to false to
prevent an uninitialized variable bug.
Fixes: f8a65ab2f3ff ("bonding: fix link recovery in mode 2 when updelay is nonzero")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
---
This was found by Smatch. Another Smatch warning that might be worth
investigating is:
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:5071 bond_update_slave_arr() warn: missing error code here? 'bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info()' failed. 'ret' = '0'
I don't know the code well enough to say if that's a real bug.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index c87481033995..8a57a5681461 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
int link_state, commit = 0;
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- bool ignore_updelay;
+ bool ignore_updelay = false;
if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
ignore_updelay = !rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists