[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <156aaabc-a7f6-e7e6-eb0b-d8943f212c1f@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:43:07 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Tianyu Yuan <tianyu.yuan@...igine.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
Edward Cree <edward.cree@....com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
oss-drivers <oss-drivers@...igine.com>,
Ziyang Chen <ziyang.chen@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next] tc: allow drivers to accept gact with PIPE
when offloading
On 28/11/2022 13:11, Marcelo Leitner wrote:
> Exactly. Then, when this patchset (or similar) come up, it won't
> update all actions with the same stats anymore. It will require a set
> of stats from hw for the gact with PIPE action here. But if drivers
> are ignoring this action, they can't have specific stats for it. Or am
> I missing something?
>
> So it is better for the drivers to reject the whole flow instead of
> simply ignoring it, and let vswitchd probe if it should or should not
> use this action.
I agree. Drivers should only accept a flow with a 'gact pipe' action
if they are able to perform the stats offload it requests.
Getting userland to autodiscover whether it can make use of this is a
SMOP, better than having it always try to use it and then sometimes
get confused that the resulting stats are wrong or meaningless.
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists