[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4XZkZJHVvLgTIk9@lavr>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:06:09 +0100
From: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@...valent.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] selftests/bpf: Verify xdp_metadata
xdp->af_xdp path
On 22/11/21 10:25, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> +
> + if (bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp_supported(ctx))
> + meta->rx_timestamp = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx);
> +
> + if (bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash_supported(ctx))
> + meta->rx_hash = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx);
Is there a case when F_supported and F are not called in a sequence? If not,
then you can join them:
bool (*ndo_xdp_rx_timestamp)(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *timestamp);
so that a calling XDP program does one indirect call instead of two for one
field
if (bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx, &meta->rx_timestamp)) {
/* ... couldn't get the timestamp */
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists