lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:12:09 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 00/12] Fix rtnl_mutex deadlock with DPAA2 and SFP modules

This patch set deliberately targets net-next and lacks Fixes: tags due
to caution on my part.

While testing some SFP modules on the Solidrun Honeycomb LX2K platform,
I noticed that rebooting causes a deadlock:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.1.0-rc5-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #656 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

but task is already holding lock:
ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(rtnl_mutex);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

6 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
 #0: ffffa62db6863c70 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0xd4/0x260
 #1: ffff2f2b0176f100 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0xf4/0x260
 #2: ffff2f2b017be900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0x104/0x260
 #3: ffff2f2b017680f0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x260
 #4: ffff2f2b0e1608f0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x260
 #5: ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #656
Hardware name: SolidRun LX2160A Honeycomb (DT)
Call trace:
 lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
 __mutex_lock+0x98/0x460
 mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x40
 rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30
 sfp_bus_del_upstream+0x1c/0xac
 phylink_destroy+0x1c/0x50
 dpaa2_mac_disconnect+0x28/0x70
 dpaa2_eth_remove+0x1dc/0x1f0
 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x24/0x60
 device_remove+0x70/0x80
 device_release_driver_internal+0x1f0/0x260
 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x110
 device_release_driver_internal+0x138/0x260
 device_release_driver+0x18/0x24
 bus_remove_device+0x12c/0x13c
 device_del+0x16c/0x424
 fsl_mc_device_remove+0x28/0x40
 __fsl_mc_device_remove+0x10/0x20
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xac
 dprc_remove+0x94/0xb4
 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x24/0x60
 device_remove+0x70/0x80
 device_release_driver_internal+0x1f0/0x260
 device_release_driver+0x18/0x24
 bus_remove_device+0x12c/0x13c
 device_del+0x16c/0x424
 fsl_mc_bus_remove+0x8c/0x10c
 fsl_mc_bus_shutdown+0x10/0x20
 platform_shutdown+0x24/0x3c
 device_shutdown+0x15c/0x260
 kernel_restart+0x40/0xa4
 __do_sys_reboot+0x1e4/0x260
 __arm64_sys_reboot+0x24/0x30

But fixing this appears to be not so simple. The patch set represents my
attempt to address it.

In short, the problem is that dpaa2_mac_connect() and dpaa2_mac_disconnect()
call 2 phylink functions in a row, one takes rtnl_lock() itself -
phylink_create(), and one which requires rtnl_lock() to be held by the
caller - phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(). The existing approach in the
drivers is too simple. We take rtnl_lock() when calling dpaa2_mac_connect(),
which is what results in the deadlock.

Fixing just that creates another problem. The drivers make use of
rtnl_lock() for serializing with other code paths too. I think I've
found all those code paths, and established other mechanisms for
serializing with them.

Vladimir Oltean (12):
  net: dpaa2-eth: don't use -ENOTSUPP error code
  net: dpaa2: replace dpaa2_mac_is_type_fixed() with
    dpaa2_mac_is_type_phy()
  net: dpaa2-mac: absorb phylink_start() call into dpaa2_mac_start()
  net: dpaa2-mac: remove defensive check in dpaa2_mac_disconnect()
  net: dpaa2-eth: assign priv->mac after dpaa2_mac_connect() call
  net: dpaa2-switch: assign port_priv->mac after dpaa2_mac_connect()
    call
  net: dpaa2: publish MAC stringset to ethtool -S even if MAC is missing
  net: dpaa2-switch replace direct MAC access with
    dpaa2_switch_port_has_mac()
  net: dpaa2-eth: connect to MAC before requesting the "endpoint
    changed" IRQ
  net: dpaa2-eth: serialize changes to priv->mac with a mutex
  net: dpaa2-switch: serialize changes to priv->mac with a mutex
  net: dpaa2-mac: move rtnl_lock() only around
    phylink_{,dis}connect_phy()

 .../freescale/dpaa2/mac-phy-support.rst       |  9 +-
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c  | 87 ++++++++++++-------
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.h  | 11 +--
 .../ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-ethtool.c  | 70 ++++++++++-----
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-mac.c  | 16 +++-
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-mac.h  | 10 ++-
 .../freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch-ethtool.c    | 45 ++++++----
 .../ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c   | 59 +++++++++----
 .../ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.h   |  9 +-
 9 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ