netdev - Re: reply to Bitterblue Smith (was [PATCH] drivers: rewrite and remove a superfluous parameter.)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221129155534.GC29574@1wt.eu>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:55:34 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     JunASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
Cc:     rtl8821cerfe2@...il.com, Jes.Sorensen@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reply to Bitterblue Smith  (was [PATCH] drivers: rewrite and
 remove a superfluous parameter.)

Hello,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:22:12PM +0800, JunASAKA wrote:
> 	I think you're right and I am comparing those sorces. But the realtek official driver 
> is far different from the one in rtl8xxxu module. I think it's difficult for me to do it, but
> I am trying my best.

Would you please preserve the original subject from the thread
of messages you are responding to instead of replacing it with a
useless "reply to Bitterblue Smith" which nobody knows what it's
about and which doesn't bring anything to the discussion since it's
written in your message who you're responding to ? It's the third
such message you send to the list, at first I tagged them as spam
until I saw some responses. Most readers will likely do the same,
and even by doing this the best you're doing is to train anti-spam
systems to learn these as valid messages (which they do not look
like).

Thanks in advance,
Willy