netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix probe failed when modprobe modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:37:09 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        stefanha@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, kraxel@...hat.com,
        david@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net,
        asmadeus@...ewreck.org, linux_oss@...debyte.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix probe failed when modprobe modules

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 6:14 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:10:01AM +0800, Li Zetao wrote:
> > This patchset fixes similar issue, the root cause of the
> > problem is that the virtqueues are not stopped on error
> > handling path.
>
> I've been thinking about this.
> Almost all drivers are affected.
>
> The reason really is that it used to be the right thing to do:
> On legacy pci del_vqs writes 0
> into vq index

into vq address actually?

> and this resets the device as a side effect

I think there's no guarantee for a device to do this.

> (we actually do this multiple times, what e.g. writes of MSI vector
>  after the 1st reset do I have no idea).
>
> mmio ccw and modern pci don't.
>
> Given this has been with us for a while I am inlined to look for
> a global solution rather than tweaking each driver.

But do we still need patches for -stable at least?

>
> Given many drivers are supposed to work on legacy too, we know del_vqs
> includes a reset for many of them. So I think I see a better way to do
> this:
>
> Add virtio_reset_device_and_del_vqs()

What's the difference with the current del_vqs method? Is this something like:

virtio_reset_device();
config->del_vqs();

>
> and convert all drivers to that.
>
> When doing this, we also need to/can fix a related problem (and related
> to the hardening that Jason Wang was looking into):
> virtio_reset_device is inherently racy: vq interrupts could
> be in flight when we do reset. We need to prevent handlers from firing in
> the window between reset and freeing the irq, so we should first
> free irqs and only then start changing the state by e.g.
> device reset.

Yes.

>
>
> Quite a lot of core work here. Jason are you still looking into
> hardening?

Yes, last time we've discussed a solution that depends on the first
kick to enable the interrupt handler. But after some thought, it seems
risky since there's no guarantee that the device work in this way.

One example is the current vhost_net, it doesn't wait for the kick to
process the rx packets. Any more thought on this?

Thanks


>
>
>
> > Li Zetao (4):
> >   9p: Fix probe failed when modprobe 9pnet_virtio
> >   virtio-mem: Fix probe failed when modprobe virtio_mem
> >   virtio-input: Fix probe failed when modprobe virtio_input
> >   virtio-blk: Fix probe failed when modprobe virtio_blk
> >
> >  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c    | 1 +
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c | 1 +
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c   | 1 +
> >  net/9p/trans_virtio.c         | 1 +
> >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>