netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4eDnrFcv+Issnem@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:23:58 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>,
        Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions

Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 04:21:13PM CET, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:37:22PM CET, vfedorenko@...ek.ru wrote:
>>From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>

[...]

>>+struct dpll_device {
>
>Just "dpll" please. Device somehow indicates this is managing device on
>the bus. It is misleading.

Hmm, on a second thought, I think it is okay to have the "device" here.
Please ignore this comment :)