[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d5eb0b9-4021-011e-5b27-8d84493bd125@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:48:34 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
razor@...ckwall.org, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next,v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: add xfrm_info tests
On 11/30/22 10:41 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> +static int probe_iproute2(void)
>> +{
>> + if (SYS_NOFAIL("ip link add type xfrm help 2>&1 | "
>> + "grep external > /dev/null")) {
>> + fprintf(stdout, "%s:SKIP: iproute2 with xfrm external support needed
>> for this test\n", __func__);
>
> Unfortunately, the BPF CI iproute2 does not have this support also :(
> I am worry it will just stay SKIP for some time and rot. Can you try to
> directly use netlink here?
To be clear, I meant directly use netlink only for the xfrm link creation
>
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/3578467213/jobs/6019370754#step:6:6395
Powered by blists - more mailing lists