netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:37:31 +0300
From:   Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        soc@...nel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding

On 1.12.2022 13:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com> writes:
>> On 30.11.2022 18:55, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 05:10:35PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>
>>>> With this patch series, we're completely getting rid of 'label = "cpu";'
>>>> which is not used by the DSA dt-binding at all.
>>>>
>>>> Information for taking the patches for maintainers:
>>>> Patch 1: netdev maintainers (based off netdev/net-next.git main)
>>>> Patch 2-3: SoC maintainers (based off soc/soc.git soc/dt)
>>>> Patch 4: MIPS maintainers (based off mips/linux.git mips-next)
>>>> Patch 5: PowerPC maintainers (based off powerpc/linux.git next-test)
>>>
>>> Hi Arınç
>>>
>>> So your plan is that each architecture maintainer merges one patch?
>>
>> Initially, I sent this series to soc@...nel.org to take it all but Rob
>> said it must be this way instead.
>>
>>>
>>> That is fine, but it is good to be explicit, otherwise patches will
>>> fall through the cracks because nobody picks them up. I generally use
>>> To: to indicate who i expect to merge a patch, and everybody else in
>>> the Cc:
>>
>> Thanks for this, I'll follow suit if I don't see any activity for a few
>> weeks.
> 
> IMHO the best solution if the patches are truly independent is to send
> them independantly to each maintainer. That way there's no confusion
> about whether someone else will take the series.
> 
> It's also simpler for maintainers to apply a single standalone patch vs
> pick a single patch from a larger series.

I agree. I'll do that next time.

Cheers.
Arınç