lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37a2632f-e65c-a2a3-1382-972a40994bb3@zzy040330.moe>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:28:35 +0800
From:   Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
To:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        "Jes.Sorensen@...il.com" <Jes.Sorensen@...il.com>
Cc:     "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu

On 01/12/2022 10:18 am, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 9:39 AM
>> To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>; Jes.Sorensen@...il.com
>> Cc: kvalo@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
>> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu
>>
>> On 01/12/2022 8:54 am, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: JunASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:09 PM
>>>> To: Jes.Sorensen@...il.com
>>>> Cc: kvalo@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
>>>> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; JunASAKA
>>>> <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu
>>>>
>>>> Fixing "Path A RX IQK failed" and "Path B RX IQK failed"
>>>> issues for rtl8192eu chips by replacing the arguments with
>>>> the ones in the updated official driver.
>>> I think it would be better if you can point out which version you use, and
>>> people will not modify them back to old version suddenly.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: JunASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c         | 76 +++++++++++++------
>>>>    1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>> index b06508d0cd..82346500f2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> @@ -891,22 +907,28 @@ static int rtl8192eu_iqk_path_b(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
>>>>
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_UNKNOWN_DF, 0x00180);
>>>> -	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>>
>>>> -	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_WE_LUT, 0x800a0);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_RCK_OS, 0x20000);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_TXPA_G1, 0x0000f);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_TXPA_G2, 0x07f77);
>>>> +
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>>
>>>> +	// rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>> +	// rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>> +
>>> I think this is a test code of vendor driver. No need them here.
>>>
>>>
>>>>    	/* Path B IQK setting */
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_TONE_A, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_TONE_A, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_TONE_B, 0x18008c1c);
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_TONE_B, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>
>>>> -	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_PI_B, 0x821403e2);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_PI_B, 0x82140303);
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_PI_B, 0x68160000);
>>>>
>>>>    	/* LO calibration setting */
>>>> -	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_RSP, 0x00492911);
>>>> +	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_RSP, 0x00462911);
>>>>
>>>>    	/* One shot, path A LOK & IQK */
>>>>    	rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_PTS, 0xfa000000);
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I have compared your patch with internal code, and they are the same.
>>> But, I don't have a test.
>>>
>>> Ping-Ke
>> I changed those arguments into the ones here:
>> https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver which works fine with my
>> rtl8192eu wifi dongle. But forgive my ignorant that I don't have enough
>> experience on wifi drivers, I just compared those two drivers and
>> figured that those codes fixing my IQK failures.
> I do similar things as well. :-)
>
> The github repository mentioned
> "This branch is based on Realtek's driver versioned 4.4.1. master is based on 4.3.1.1 originally."
> So, we can add something to commit message:
> 1. https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver
> 2. vendor driver version: 4.3.1.1
>
> --
> Ping-Ke
>
Thanks for your advice, I will do it right now.


Jun ASAKA.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ