netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:42:30 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy
 delay_chain configuration

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:16PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:49:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:02:42PM +0800, Yanhong Wang wrote:
> > > riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy delay_chain configuration
> > > 
> > > Add phy delay_chain configuration to support motorcomm phy driver for
> > > StarFive VisionFive 2 board.
> 
> nit: please re-word this commit next time around to actually say what
> you're doing here. I didn't notice it initially, but this patch is doing
> a lot more than adding `delay_chain` configuration. To my dwmac unaware
> brain, there's nothing hits for that term outside of the changelog :(

Hi Conor

I suspect once we see the documentation of the binding, it will get
rejected and implemented differently. So i would not worry too much
about this at the moment.

      Andrew