[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4f3NGAZ2rqHkjWV@gvm01>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 01:37:08 +0100
From: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: [PATCH net] stmmac: fix potential division by 0
Depending on the HW platform and configuration, the
stmmac_config_sub_second_increment() function may return 0 in the
sec_inc variable. Therefore, the subsequent div_u64 operation can Oops
the kernel because of the divisor being 0.
Signed-off-by: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 23ec0a9e396c..6ed1704b638d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ int stmmac_init_tstamp_counter(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 systime_flags)
stmmac_config_sub_second_increment(priv, priv->ptpaddr,
priv->plat->clk_ptp_rate,
xmac, &sec_inc);
- temp = div_u64(1000000000ULL, sec_inc);
+ temp = div_u64(1000000000ULL, max_t(u32, sec_inc, 1));
/* Store sub second increment for later use */
priv->sub_second_inc = sec_inc;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists