| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4657D9753412AD9DEE7FAB7D9B179@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:27:32 +0000
From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 1:41 PM
>
>Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:37:24PM CET, vfedorenko@...ek.ru wrote:
>>From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>
>>
>>Implement basic DPLL operations in ptp_ocp driver as the
>>simplest example of using new subsystem.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>
>>---
>> drivers/ptp/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>>index fe4971b65c64..8c4cfabc1bfa 100644
>>--- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>>+++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
>>@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_OCP
>> depends on COMMON_CLK
>> select NET_DEVLINK
>> select CRC16
>>+ select DPLL
>> help
>> This driver adds support for an OpenCompute time card.
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>>index 154d58cbd9ce..605853ac4a12 100644
>>--- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>>+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
>>@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>> #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/crc16.h>
>>+#include <linux/dpll.h>
>>+#include <uapi/linux/dpll.h>
>>
>> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_FACEBOOK 0x1d9b
>> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_FACEBOOK_TIMECARD 0x0400
>>@@ -353,6 +355,7 @@ struct ptp_ocp {
>> struct ptp_ocp_signal signal[4];
>> struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector sma[4];
>> const struct ocp_sma_op *sma_op;
>>+ struct dpll_device *dpll;
>> };
>>
>> #define OCP_REQ_TIMESTAMP BIT(0)
>>@@ -835,18 +838,19 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(ptp_ocp_idr);
>> struct ocp_selector {
>> const char *name;
>> int value;
>>+ int dpll_type;
>> };
>>
>> static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_clock[] = {
>>- { .name = "NONE", .value = 0 },
>>- { .name = "TOD", .value = 1 },
>>- { .name = "IRIG", .value = 2 },
>>- { .name = "PPS", .value = 3 },
>>- { .name = "PTP", .value = 4 },
>>- { .name = "RTC", .value = 5 },
>>- { .name = "DCF", .value = 6 },
>>- { .name = "REGS", .value = 0xfe },
>>- { .name = "EXT", .value = 0xff },
>>+ { .name = "NONE", .value = 0, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "TOD", .value = 1, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "IRIG", .value = 2, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "PPS", .value = 3, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "PTP", .value = 4, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "RTC", .value = 5, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "DCF", .value = 6, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "REGS", .value = 0xfe, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "EXT", .value = 0xff, .dpll_type = 0 },
>> { }
>> };
>>
>>@@ -855,37 +859,37 @@ static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_clock[] = {
>> #define SMA_SELECT_MASK GENMASK(14, 0)
>>
>> static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_sma_in[] = {
>>- { .name = "10Mhz", .value = 0x0000 },
>>- { .name = "PPS1", .value = 0x0001 },
>>- { .name = "PPS2", .value = 0x0002 },
>>- { .name = "TS1", .value = 0x0004 },
>>- { .name = "TS2", .value = 0x0008 },
>>- { .name = "IRIG", .value = 0x0010 },
>>- { .name = "DCF", .value = 0x0020 },
>>- { .name = "TS3", .value = 0x0040 },
>>- { .name = "TS4", .value = 0x0080 },
>>- { .name = "FREQ1", .value = 0x0100 },
>>- { .name = "FREQ2", .value = 0x0200 },
>>- { .name = "FREQ3", .value = 0x0400 },
>>- { .name = "FREQ4", .value = 0x0800 },
>>- { .name = "None", .value = SMA_DISABLE },
>>+ { .name = "10Mhz", .value = 0x0000, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_10_MHZ },
>>+ { .name = "PPS1", .value = 0x0001, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_1_PPS },
>>+ { .name = "PPS2", .value = 0x0002, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_1_PPS },
>>+ { .name = "TS1", .value = 0x0004, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "TS2", .value = 0x0008, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "IRIG", .value = 0x0010, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "DCF", .value = 0x0020, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "TS3", .value = 0x0040, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "TS4", .value = 0x0080, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "FREQ1", .value = 0x0100, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "FREQ2", .value = 0x0200, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "FREQ3", .value = 0x0400, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "FREQ4", .value = 0x0800, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "None", .value = SMA_DISABLE, .dpll_type = 0 },
>> { }
>> };
>>
>> static const struct ocp_selector ptp_ocp_sma_out[] = {
>>- { .name = "10Mhz", .value = 0x0000 },
>>- { .name = "PHC", .value = 0x0001 },
>>- { .name = "MAC", .value = 0x0002 },
>>- { .name = "GNSS1", .value = 0x0004 },
>>- { .name = "GNSS2", .value = 0x0008 },
>>- { .name = "IRIG", .value = 0x0010 },
>>- { .name = "DCF", .value = 0x0020 },
>>- { .name = "GEN1", .value = 0x0040 },
>>- { .name = "GEN2", .value = 0x0080 },
>>- { .name = "GEN3", .value = 0x0100 },
>>- { .name = "GEN4", .value = 0x0200 },
>>- { .name = "GND", .value = 0x2000 },
>>- { .name = "VCC", .value = 0x4000 },
>>+ { .name = "10Mhz", .value = 0x0000, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_10_MHZ },
>>+ { .name = "PHC", .value = 0x0001, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "MAC", .value = 0x0002, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GNSS1", .value = 0x0004, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_1_PPS },
>>+ { .name = "GNSS2", .value = 0x0008, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_1_PPS },
>>+ { .name = "IRIG", .value = 0x0010, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "DCF", .value = 0x0020, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GEN1", .value = 0x0040, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GEN2", .value = 0x0080, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GEN3", .value = 0x0100, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GEN4", .value = 0x0200, .dpll_type =
>DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ },
>>+ { .name = "GND", .value = 0x2000, .dpll_type = 0 },
>>+ { .name = "VCC", .value = 0x4000, .dpll_type = 0 },
>> { }
>> };
>>
>>@@ -4175,12 +4179,41 @@ ptp_ocp_detach(struct ptp_ocp *bp)
>> device_unregister(&bp->dev);
>> }
>>
>>+static int ptp_ocp_dpll_get_attr(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct
>dpll_attr *attr)
>>+{
>>+ struct ptp_ocp *bp = (struct ptp_ocp *)dpll_priv(dpll);
>>+ int sync;
>>+
>>+ sync = ioread32(&bp->reg->status) & OCP_STATUS_IN_SYNC;
>>+ dpll_attr_lock_status_set(attr, sync ? DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED :
>DPLL_LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED);
>
>get,set,confuse. This attr thing sucks, sorry :/
Once again, I feel obligated to add some explanations :)
getter is ops called by dpll subsystem, it requires data, so here value shall
be set for the caller, right?
Also have explained the reason why this attr struct and functions are done this
way in the response to cover letter concerns.
>
>
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int ptp_ocp_dpll_pin_get_attr(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct
>dpll_pin *pin,
>>+ struct dpll_pin_attr *attr)
>>+{
>>+ dpll_pin_attr_type_set(attr, DPLL_PIN_TYPE_EXT);
>
>This is exactly what I was talking about in the cover letter. This is
>const, should be put into static struct and passed to
>dpll_device_alloc().
Actually this type or some other parameters might change in the run-time,
depends on the device, it is up to the driver how it will handle any getter,
if driver knows it won't change it could also have some static member and copy
the data with: dpll_pin_attr_copy(...);
>
>
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
>>+ .get = ptp_ocp_dpll_get_attr,
>>+};
>>+
>>+static struct dpll_pin_ops dpll_pin_ops = {
>>+ .get = ptp_ocp_dpll_pin_get_attr,
>>+};
>>+
>> static int
>> ptp_ocp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> {
>>+ const u8 dpll_cookie[DPLL_COOKIE_LEN] = { "OCP" };
>>+ char pin_desc[PIN_DESC_LEN];
>> struct devlink *devlink;
>>+ struct dpll_pin *pin;
>> struct ptp_ocp *bp;
>>- int err;
>>+ int err, i;
>>
>> devlink = devlink_alloc(&ptp_ocp_devlink_ops, sizeof(*bp), &pdev-
>>dev);
>> if (!devlink) {
>>@@ -4230,6 +4263,20 @@ ptp_ocp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
>pci_device_id *id)
>>
>> ptp_ocp_info(bp);
>> devlink_register(devlink);
>>+
>>+ bp->dpll = dpll_device_alloc(&dpll_ops, DPLL_TYPE_PPS, dpll_cookie,
>pdev->bus->number, bp, &pdev->dev);
>>+ if (!bp->dpll) {
>>+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dpll_device_alloc failed\n");
>>+ goto out;
>>+ }
>>+ dpll_device_register(bp->dpll);
>
>You still have the 2 step init process. I believe it would be better to
>just have dpll_device_create/destroy() to do it in one shot.
For me either is ok, but due to pins alloc/register as explained below I would
leave it as it is.
>
>
>>+
>>+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>>+ snprintf(pin_desc, PIN_DESC_LEN, "sma%d", i + 1);
>>+ pin = dpll_pin_alloc(pin_desc, PIN_DESC_LEN);
>>+ dpll_pin_register(bp->dpll, pin, &dpll_pin_ops, bp);
>
>Same here, no point of having 2 step init.
The alloc of a pin is not required if the pin already exist and would be just
registered with another dpll.
Once we decide to entirely drop shared pins idea this could be probably done,
although other kernel code usually use this twostep approach?
>
>
>>+ }
>>+
>> return 0;
>
>
>Btw, did you consider having dpll instance here as and auxdev? It would
>be suitable I believe. It is quite simple to do it. See following patch
>as an example:
I haven't think about it, definetly gonna take a look to see if there any
benefits in ice.
Thanks,
Arkadiusz
>
>commit bd02fd76d1909637c95e8ef13e7fd1e748af910d
>Author: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>Date: Mon Jul 25 10:29:17 2022 +0200
>
> mlxsw: core_linecards: Introduce per line card auxiliary device
>
>
>
>
>>
>> out:
>>@@ -4247,6 +4294,8 @@ ptp_ocp_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> struct ptp_ocp *bp = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(bp);
>>
>>+ dpll_device_unregister(bp->dpll);
>>+ dpll_device_free(bp->dpll);
>> devlink_unregister(devlink);
>> ptp_ocp_detach(bp);
>> pci_disable_device(pdev);
>>--
>>2.27.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists