netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: remove NULL check before dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:43:57 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, zhang.songyi@....com.cn,
        saeedm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, mbloch@...dia.com, maorg@...dia.com,
        elic@...dia.com, jerrliu@...dia.com, cmi@...dia.com,
        vladbu@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: remove NULL check before dev_{put,
 hold}

On 30 Nov 09:25, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:00:34 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:41:27PM +0800, zhang.songyi@....com.cn wrote:
>> > From: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>
>> >
>> > The call netdev_{put, hold} of dev_{put, hold} will check NULL,
>> > so there is no need to check before using dev_{put, hold}.
>> >
>> > Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>> > /drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c:1450:2-10:
>> > WARNING:
>> > WARNING  NULL check before dev_{put, hold} functions is not needed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: zhang songyi <zhang.songyi@....com.cn>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c | 3 +--
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Please change all places in mlx5 in one patch.
>
>Your call as a mlx5 maintainer, but I'd say don't change them at all.
>All these trivial patches are such a damn waste of time.

I agree, let's not waste more time on this, I will accept this patch as is
since it's already marked awating-upstream.. 

Applied to net-next-mlx5