netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect route flushing when source address is deleted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Dec 2022 09:25:27 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, mark.tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
        sharpd@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect route flushing when source
 address is deleted

On 12/4/22 12:50 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Cited commit added the table ID to the FIB info structure, but did not
> prevent structures with different table IDs from being consolidated.
> This can lead to routes being flushed from a VRF when an address is
> deleted from a different VRF.
> 
> Fix by taking the table ID into account when looking for a matching FIB
> info. This is already done for FIB info structures backed by a nexthop
> object in fib_find_info_nh().
> 
> Add test cases that fail before the fix:
> 
>  # ./fib_tests.sh -t ipv4_del_addr
> 
>  IPv4 delete address route tests
>      Regular FIB info
>      TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted            [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in default VRF not removed                              [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted      [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete                 [ OK ]
>      Identical FIB info with different table ID
>      TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted            [FAIL]
>      TEST: Route in default VRF not removed                              [ OK ]
>  RTNETLINK answers: File exists
>      TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted      [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete                 [FAIL]
> 
>  Tests passed:   6
>  Tests failed:   2
> 
> And pass after:
> 
>  # ./fib_tests.sh -t ipv4_del_addr
> 
>  IPv4 delete address route tests
>      Regular FIB info
>      TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted            [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in default VRF not removed                              [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted      [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete                 [ OK ]
>      Identical FIB info with different table ID
>      TEST: Route removed from VRF when source address deleted            [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in default VRF not removed                              [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route removed in default VRF when source address deleted      [ OK ]
>      TEST: Route in VRF is not removed by address delete                 [ OK ]
> 
>  Tests passed:   8
>  Tests failed:   0
> 
> Fixes: 5a56a0b3a45d ("net: Don't delete routes in different VRFs")
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c                 |  1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>