[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y44k7X5YYbuSntd2@lore-desk>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:05:49 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, sujuan.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: fix possible
deadlock if mtk_wed_wo_init fails
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 12:14:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Introduce __mtk_wed_detach() in order to avoid a possible deadlock in
> > mtk_wed_attach routine if mtk_wed_wo_init fails.
> > Check wo pointer is properly allocated before running mtk_wed_wo_reset()
> > and mtk_wed_wo_deinit() in __mtk_wed_detach routine.
> > Honor mtk_wed_mcu_send_msg return value in mtk_wed_wo_reset().
> >
> > Fixes: 4c5de09eb0d0 ("net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add configure wed wo support")
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - move wo pointer checks in __mtk_wed_detach()
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c | 30 ++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
> > index d041615b2bac..2ce9fbb1c66d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c
> > @@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ mtk_wed_wo_reset(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > mtk_wdma_tx_reset(dev);
> > mtk_wed_reset(dev, MTK_WED_RESET_WED);
> >
> > - mtk_wed_mcu_send_msg(wo, MTK_WED_MODULE_ID_WO,
> > - MTK_WED_WO_CMD_CHANGE_STATE, &state,
> > - sizeof(state), false);
> > + if (mtk_wed_mcu_send_msg(wo, MTK_WED_MODULE_ID_WO,
> > + MTK_WED_WO_CMD_CHANGE_STATE, &state,
> > + sizeof(state), false))
> > + return;
> >
> > if (readx_poll_timeout(mtk_wed_wo_read_status, dev, val,
> > val == MTK_WED_WOIF_DISABLE_DONE,
> > @@ -576,12 +577,10 @@ mtk_wed_deinit(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > -mtk_wed_detach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > +__mtk_wed_detach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct mtk_wed_hw *hw = dev->hw;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&hw_lock);
> > -
> > mtk_wed_deinit(dev);
> >
> > mtk_wdma_rx_reset(dev);
> > @@ -590,9 +589,11 @@ mtk_wed_detach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > mtk_wed_free_tx_rings(dev);
> >
> > if (mtk_wed_get_rx_capa(dev)) {
> > - mtk_wed_wo_reset(dev);
> > + if (hw->wed_wo)
> > + mtk_wed_wo_reset(dev);
> > mtk_wed_free_rx_rings(dev);
> > - mtk_wed_wo_deinit(hw);
> > + if (hw->wed_wo)
> > + mtk_wed_wo_deinit(hw);
> > }
> >
> > if (dev->wlan.bus_type == MTK_WED_BUS_PCIE) {
> > @@ -612,6 +613,13 @@ mtk_wed_detach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> >
> > hw->wed_dev = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +mtk_wed_detach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&hw_lock);
> > + __mtk_wed_detach(dev);
> > mutex_unlock(&hw_lock);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1490,8 +1498,10 @@ mtk_wed_attach(struct mtk_wed_device *dev)
> > ret = mtk_wed_wo_init(hw);
> > }
> > out:
> > - if (ret)
> > - mtk_wed_detach(dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev->hw->dev, "failed to attach wed device\n");
> > + __mtk_wed_detach(dev);
> > + }
> > unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&hw_lock);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c
> > index f9539e6233c9..3dd02889d972 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c
> > @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ int mtk_wed_mcu_msg_update(struct mtk_wed_device *dev, int id, void *data,
> > if (dev->hw->version == 1)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (!wo)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
>
> Can you please help me to understand how and when this mtk_wed_mcu_msg_update()
> function is called?
>
> I see this line .msg_update = mtk_wed_mcu_msg_update, and
> relevant mtk_wed_device_update_msg() define, but nothing calls to this
> define.
mtk_wed_device_update_msg() is currently run by mt7915 driver in
mt7915_mcu_wed_enable_rx_stats() and in mt76_connac_mcu_sta_wed_update().
At the moment we always run mtk_wed_mcu_msg_update with non-NULL wo pointer,
but I would prefer to add this safety check.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
>
>
> > return mtk_wed_mcu_send_msg(wo, MTK_WED_MODULE_ID_WO, id, data, len,
> > true);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists