[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y42z8kv8ehkk6YKf@kadam>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:03:46 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvneta: Prevent out of bounds read in
mvneta_config_rss()
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 02:47:13PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:58:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The pp->indir[0] value comes from the user. It is passed to:
> >
> > if (cpu_online(pp->rxq_def))
> >
> > inside the mvneta_percpu_elect() function. It needs bounds checkeding
> > to ensure that it is not beyond the end of the cpu bitmap.
> >
> > Fixes: cad5d847a093 ("net: mvneta: Fix the CPU choice in mvneta_percpu_elect")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> I would expect that ethtool_copy_validate_indir() will prevent this.
>
Huh... Sort of, but in the strictest sense, no. mvneta_ethtool_get_rxnfc()
sets the cap at 8 by default or an unvalidated module parameter.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists