lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:09:21 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Cc:     liwei391@...wei.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfc: llcp: Fix race in handling llcp_devices

Hello,

On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 15:12 +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
> @@ -282,9 +285,13 @@ struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_find_local(struct nfc_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
>  
> +	spin_lock(&llcp_devices_list_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(local, &llcp_devices, list)
> -		if (local->dev == dev)
> +		if (local->dev == dev) {
> +			spin_unlock(&llcp_devices_list_lock);

I'm sorry for not noticing the above earlier, but it looks like this is
not enough. At this point local_release() may kick in and free 'local':
the caller will experience UaF. 

You could acquire a reference here and let the caller release it.

If the above race is not possible due to some other safeguards, it
should at least be documented clearly here.

Thanks,

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ