netdev - [PATCH net-next 01/32] rxrpc: Fix missing unlock in rxrpc_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <167034232478.1105287.13584934117599532331.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 06 Dec 2022 15:58:44 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/32] rxrpc: Fix missing unlock in
 rxrpc_do_sendmsg()

One of the error paths in rxrpc_do_sendmsg() doesn't unlock the the call
mutex before returning.  Fix it to do this.

Note that this still doesn't get rid of the checker warning:

   ../net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:617:5: warning: context imbalance in 'rxrpc_do_sendmsg' - wrong count at exit

I think the interplay between the socket lock and the call's user_mutex may
be too complicated for checker to analyse, especially as
rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(), which it calls, returns with the
call's user_mutex if successful but unconditionally drops the socket lock.

Fixes: e754eba685aa ("rxrpc: Provide a cmsg to specify the amount of Tx data for a call")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
---

 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 9fa7e37f7155..cde1e65f16b4 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int rxrpc_do_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
 			if (call->tx_total_len != -1 ||
 			    call->tx_pending ||
 			    call->tx_top != 0)
-				goto error_put;
+				goto out_put_unlock;
 			call->tx_total_len = p.call.tx_total_len;
 		}
 	}