netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Fix warn: passing zero to PTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 08:39:42 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Fix warn: passing zero
 to PTR_ERR

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > -     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK) ||
> > > > -         !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING))
> > > > -             return 0;
> > > > -
> > > 
> > > Why are you removing this ?
> > > 
> > 
> > I got review comment from Richard in v2 as below, making it as consistent by checking ptp_clock. So removed it in next revision.
> > 
> > " > static int lan8814_ptp_probe_once(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > > {
> > >         struct lan8814_shared_priv *shared = phydev->shared->priv;
> > > 
> > >         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK) ||
> > >             !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING))
> > >                 return 0;
> > 
> > It is weird to use macros here, but not before calling ptp_clock_register.
> > Make it consistent by checking shared->ptp_clock instead.
> > That is also better form."
> 
> O.K. If Richard said this fine.

I just want to avoid drivers will #ifdef|IS_ENABLED all over the place.

Thanks,
Richard