[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y49zzo/L9oY1v8OB@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:54:38 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, alice.michael@...el.com,
piotr.marczak@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
leon@...nel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] intel/i40e: Fix potential memory leak in
i40e_init_recovery_mode()
Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 02:41:46PM CET, yuancan@...wei.com wrote:
>The error handling path of i40e_init_recovery_mode() does not handle the
>vsi->netdev and pf->vsi, and resource leak can happen if error occurs.
>
>In the meantime, the i40e_probe() returns directly without release
>pf->qp_pile when i40e_init_recovery_mode() failed.
>
>Fix by properly releasing vsi->netdev in the error handling path of
>i40e_init_recovery_mode() and relying on the error handling path of
>i40e_probe() to release pf->vsi and pf->qp_pile if anything goes wrong.
>
>Fixes: 4ff0ee1af016 ("i40e: Introduce recovery mode support")
>Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com>
>---
>Changes in v3:
>- Introduce more error handling path to handle vsi->netdev
>- Rely on error path of i40e_probe() instead of do all cleanup in
> i40e_init_recovery_mode() to make sure pf->qp_pile is not leaked
>
>Changes in v2:
>- Add net in patch title
>- Add Leon Romanovsky's reviewed by
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>index b5dcd15ced36..d1aadd298ea7 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
>@@ -15511,13 +15511,13 @@ static int i40e_init_recovery_mode(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct i40e_hw *hw)
> goto err_switch_setup;
> err = register_netdev(vsi->netdev);
> if (err)
>- goto err_switch_setup;
>+ goto free_netdev;
> vsi->netdev_registered = true;
> i40e_dbg_pf_init(pf);
>
> err = i40e_setup_misc_vector_for_recovery_mode(pf);
> if (err)
>- goto err_switch_setup;
>+ goto unreg_netdev;
>
> /* tell the firmware that we're starting */
> i40e_send_version(pf);
>@@ -15528,15 +15528,15 @@ static int i40e_init_recovery_mode(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct i40e_hw *hw)
>
> return 0;
>
>+unreg_netdev:
>+ unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
>+free_netdev:
>+ free_netdev(vsi->netdev);
[...]
> err_switch_setup:
> i40e_reset_interrupt_capability(pf);
> del_timer_sync(&pf->service_timer);
> i40e_shutdown_adminq(hw);
These are on a error patch in i40e_probe(). Again, you should cleanup
here only what you initialized.
>- iounmap(hw->hw_addr);
>- pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pf->pdev);
>- pci_release_mem_regions(pf->pdev);
>- pci_disable_device(pf->pdev);
>- kfree(pf);
>+ kfree(pf->vsi);
>
> return err;
> }
>@@ -15789,8 +15789,11 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> goto err_sw_init;
> }
>
>- if (test_bit(__I40E_RECOVERY_MODE, pf->state))
>- return i40e_init_recovery_mode(pf, hw);
>+ if (test_bit(__I40E_RECOVERY_MODE, pf->state)) {
>+ err = i40e_init_recovery_mode(pf, hw);
>+ if (err)
>+ goto err_init_lan_hmc;
Use a new label here.
Also, you need to return 0 here in case of success. Did you test the
patch?
>+ }
>
> err = i40e_init_lan_hmc(hw, hw->func_caps.num_tx_qp,
> hw->func_caps.num_rx_qp, 0, 0);
>--
>2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists