lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:37:42 -0800 From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> To: Ji Rongfeng <SikoJobs@...look.com> Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values On 12/6/22 8:35 AM, Ji Rongfeng wrote: > I have noticed that this patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" for a few > days, but there's no comment so far, which is abnormal and confusing. It is obvious that a test is needed for this change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists