[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202212071617323068233@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:17:32 +0800 (CST)
From: <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <imagedong@...cent.com>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <petrm@...dia.com>, <liu3101@...due.edu>,
<wujianguo@...natelecom.cn>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tedheadster@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: record times of netdev_budget exhausted
> Sure, but netdev_budget set to 1 is extreme, don't you think ???
Yes of course, that is just a test to show the difference.
> We prefer not changing /proc file format as much as we can, they are
> deprecated/legacy.
Should we add some explain of the deprecation in code or doc?
As it's deprecated, I think it's NAK for this patch.
> Presumably, modern tracing techniques can let you do what you want
> without adding new counters.
Totally agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists