netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] add dt configuration for dp83867 led modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3edb5124-f01b-f77b-d929-9b360ec67593@prevas.dk>
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:48:54 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To:     Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add dt configuration for dp83867 led modes

On 07/12/2022 11.40, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hello Ansuel,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2022, 19:38:36 CET schrieb Christian Marangi:

>>> Considering Andrew is nak'ing any phy code to configure LED's until a
>>> solution using via /sys/class/leds is provided I would say there is
>>> real interest.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that you got very positive feedback for this last
>>> series. I would think if you submitted without RFC it would catch more
>>> eyes as well.
>>
>> Well yes that's the fun part. netdev really liked the concept and how it
>> was implemented (and actually also liked the use of a dedicated trigger
>> instead of bloating the netdev trigger)
>>
>> But I never got a review from LED team and that result in having the
>> patch stalled and never merged... But ok I will recover the work and
>> recheck/retest everything from the start hoping to get more traction
>> now...
> 
> I was just trying to use your RFC patchset from May 2022 for dp83867 as well, 
> with some success at least.
> I have some comments, fixes and uncertainties. How do you want to progress? 
> Resend so I can rebase on that? Anyway, put me on CC.

Yes, I'm also very interested in getting mainline support for hardware
LED triggers, and incidentally one of my peripherals also happens to be
a dp83867. So please also include me on cc if and when you find time to
post a v+1, and I'll help with testing and reviewing.

Rasmus