lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:43:17 +0000
From:   Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To:     Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>,
        "Jes.Sorensen@...il.com" <Jes.Sorensen@...il.com>
CC:     "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 11:39 AM
> To: Jes.Sorensen@...il.com
> Cc: kvalo@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jun ASAKA
> <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v5] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu
> 
> Fixing "Path A RX IQK failed" and "Path B RX IQK failed"
> issues for rtl8192eu chips by replacing the arguments with
> the ones in the updated official driver as shown below.
> 1. https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver
> 2. vendor driver version: 5.6.4
> 
> Tested-by: Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
> Signed-off-by: Jun ASAKA <JunASAKA@...040330.moe>
> Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> ---
> v5:
>  - no modification.

Then, why do you need v5?

> v4:
>  - fixed some mistakes.
> v3:
>  - add detailed info about the newer version this patch used.
>  - no functional update.
> ---
> ---

[...]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ