[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5AWkAYVEBqi5jy3@macbook-pro-6.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:29:04 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/12] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:45:45PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index fc4e313a4d2e..00951a59ee26 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -15323,6 +15323,24 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + *cnt = 0;
> +
> + if (resolve_prog_type(env->prog) == BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP) {
> + if (bpf_prog_is_offloaded(env->prog->aux)) {
> + verbose(env, "no metadata kfuncs offload\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
If I'm reading this correctly than this error will trigger
for any XDP prog trying to use a kfunc?
I was hoping that BPF CI can prove my point, but it failed to
build your newly added xdp_hw_metadata.c test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists