[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f183c51b-6d81-55e7-3433-e20c6d5604f0@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 07:17:51 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
On 07.12.22 22:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/xen-netback/rx.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 74e7e1efdad4 ("xen/netback: don't call kfree_skb() with interrupts disabled")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 9e6246518592 ("xen/netback: don't call kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()")
>
> from the net tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the version from Linus' tree) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Yes, this is the correct solution. The patch in the net tree was not complete
and the other patch needed to pushed as it fixes a 0-day security issue.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists