[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <082a47a9-74b2-1800-8c91-e38c73abc89f@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:02:10 +0100
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tsnep: Add XDP TX support
On 09.12.22 03:23, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> +static int tsnep_xdp_tx_map(struct xdp_frame *xdpf, struct tsnep_tx *tx,
>> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo, int count,
>> + bool dma_map)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dmadev = tx->adapter->dmadev;
>> + skb_frag_t *frag;
>> + unsigned int len;
>> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
>> + void *data;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + dma_addr_t dma;
>> + int map_len = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + frag = NULL;
>> + len = xdpf->len;
>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> + entry = &tx->entry[(tx->write + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE];
>> + if (dma_map) {
>
> wouldn't it have made more sense if you passed TSNEP_TX_TYPE instead of
> bool dma_map ?
> here and in tsnep_xdp_xmit_frame_ring as well..
I will give it a try.
>> +/* This function requires __netif_tx_lock is held by the caller. */
>> +static int tsnep_xdp_xmit_frame_ring(struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
>> + struct tsnep_tx *tx, bool dma_map)
>> +{
>> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo =
>> xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdpf);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int count = 1;
>> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
>> + int length;
>> + int i;
>> + int retval;
>
> Maciiej already commented on this, and i agree with him, the whole series
> needs some work on rev xmas tree variable declaration, code will look much
> neater.
So far I ordered the variable declaration by variable usage with common
variables like i and retval at the end. I will take a look an that.
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(xdp_frame_has_frags(xdpf)))
>> + count += shinfo->nr_frags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tx->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + if (tsnep_tx_desc_available(tx) < (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 + count)) {
>> + /* prevent full TX ring due to XDP */
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return -EBUSY;
>
> You don't really do anything with the retval, so just return a boolean.
Will be changed.
>> + }
>> +
>> + entry = &tx->entry[tx->write];
>> + entry->xdpf = xdpf;
>> +
>> + retval = tsnep_xdp_tx_map(xdpf, tx, shinfo, count, dma_map);
>> + if (retval < 0) {
>> + tsnep_tx_unmap(tx, tx->write, count);
>> + entry->xdpf = NULL;
>> +
>> + tx->dropped++;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + netdev_err(tx->adapter->netdev, "XDP TX DMA map failed\n");
>
> please avoid printing in data path, find other means to expose such info.
> stats
> tracepoints
> debug_message rate limited, etc ..
I will improve that.
Gerhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists