[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167057881899.16143.12680741866204985455.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:40:18 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, kuniyu@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net/sched: retpoline wrappers for tc
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:55:09 -0300 you wrote:
> In tc all qdics, classifiers and actions can be compiled as modules.
> This results today in indirect calls in all transitions in the tc hierarchy.
> Due to CONFIG_RETPOLINE, CPUs with mitigations=on might pay an extra cost on
> indirect calls. For newer Intel cpus with IBRS the extra cost is
> nonexistent, but AMD Zen cpus and older x86 cpus still go through the
> retpoline thunk.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v6,1/4] net/sched: move struct action_ops definition out of ifdef
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2a7d228f1ae7
- [net-next,v6,2/4] net/sched: add retpoline wrapper for tc
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7f0e810220e2
- [net-next,v6,3/4] net/sched: avoid indirect act functions on retpoline kernels
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/871cf386dd16
- [net-next,v6,4/4] net/sched: avoid indirect classify functions on retpoline kernels
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9f3101dca3a7
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists