netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation prints with trace points

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:26:50 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation
 prints with trace points

On 08 Dec 16:35, netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
>On 2022-12-08 16:27, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 04:22:53PM +0100, 
>>netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
>>>The follow-up patch set to the MAB patch set I have, will make use 
>>>of the age
>>>out violation.
>>
>>Ok, so for v2 I can delete the debugging print, since it's currently
>>dead code, and you can add the counter and the trace point when the 
>>code
>>will be actually exercised, how does that sound?
>
>Ok, sounds like a plan.

FWIW +1 :)