[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5KAyrdaL7qU/J+e@x130>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:26:50 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: replace ATU violation
prints with trace points
On 08 Dec 16:35, netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
>On 2022-12-08 16:27, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 04:22:53PM +0100,
>>netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
>>>The follow-up patch set to the MAB patch set I have, will make use
>>>of the age
>>>out violation.
>>
>>Ok, so for v2 I can delete the debugging print, since it's currently
>>dead code, and you can add the counter and the trace point when the
>>code
>>will be actually exercised, how does that sound?
>
>Ok, sounds like a plan.
FWIW +1 :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists