netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221208163949.3833fe7b@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:39:49 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev.dump@...il.com,
        "'Kubalewski, Arkadiusz'" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
        'Vadim Fedorenko' <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>,
        'Jonathan Lemon' <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        'Paolo Abeni' <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:28:51 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >I think we discussed using serial numbers.  
> 
> Can you remind it? Do you mean serial number of pin?

Serial number of the ASIC, board or device.
Something will have a serno, append to that your pin id of choice -
et voila!

> >Are you saying within the driver it's somehow easier? The driver state
> >is mostly per bus device, so I don't see how.  
> 
> You can have some shared data for multiple instances in the driver code,
> why not?

The question is whether it's easier.
Easier to ensure quality of n implementations in random drivers. 
Or one implementation in the core, with a lot of clever people
paying attention and reviewing the code.

> >> There are many problems with that approach, and the submitted patch is not
> >> explaining any of them. E.g. it contains the dpll_muxed_pin_register but no
> >> free 
> >> counterpart + no flows.  
> >
> >SMOC.  
> 
> Care to spell this out. I guess you didn't mean "South Middlesex
> Opportunity Council" :D

Simple matter of coding.