[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9328.1670630467@famine>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:01:07 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, liali <liali@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] Bonding: fix high prio not effect issue
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
>When a high prio link up, if there has current link, it will not do
>failover as we missed the check in link up event. Fix it in this patchset
>and add a prio option test case.
>
>Hangbin Liu (2):
> bonding: access curr_active_slave with rtnl_dereference
> bonding: do failover when high prio link up
>
>Liang Li (1):
> selftests: bonding: add bonding prio option test
For the series:
Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
The only comment I have is that since prio is a signed value, it
would be nice if the selftest tested negative prio values.
-J
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +-
> .../selftests/drivers/net/bonding/Makefile | 3 +-
> .../drivers/net/bonding/option_prio.sh | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/option_prio.sh
>
>--
>2.38.1
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists