lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 17:17:14 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Add support for epoll min wait time On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 09:05:02AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/10/22 8:58?AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:11AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Hi Linus, > >> > >> I've had this done for months and posted a few times, but little > >> attention has been received. > > > > I personally think this is particularly cool, for having faced the > > same needs in the past. I'm just wondering how long we'll avoid the > > need for marking certain FDs as urgent (i.e. for inter-thread wakeup) > > which would bypass the min delay. > > Thanks! No opinion on urgent fds, it's not something I have looked > into... We'll see over time anyway :-) > > This last patch fixes a bug introduced by the 5th one. Why not squash it > > instead of purposely introducing a bug then its fix ? Or maybe it was > > just overlooked when you sent the PR ? > > I didn't want to rebase it, so I just put the fix at the end. Not that > important imho, only issue there was an ltp case getting a wrong error > value. Hence didn't deem it important enough to warrant a rebase. OK. I tend to prefer making sure that a bisect session can never end up in the middle of a patch set for a reason other than a yet-undiscovered bug, that's why I was asking. Thanks, Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists